[Milton-L] New Milton Criticism, C. S. Lewis, and Ad Hominem Attacks

James Rovira jamesrovira at gmail.com
Mon Nov 26 22:17:01 EST 2012


Perhaps more Milton first, less criticism?

Jim R

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:12 PM, David Urban <dvu2 at calvin.edu> wrote:

> Thanks for your reply, JD.  I'll admit that I'm not entirely clear what
> you mean by your statement, so please forgive my interpretive limitations.
>  Perhaps your basic point is that Milton scholarship should be more
> proactive than reactive, and I absolutely agree with that.  At the same
> time, when scholars put forward arguments that can't be backed up by the
> texts in question, and those arguments are put forward in misleading and
> perhaps even demeaning ways, I think those scholars and their tactics need
> to be called out.
> Thanks again,
>
> David
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.richmond.edu/pipermail/milton-l/attachments/20121126/7b39d66e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Milton-L mailing list