[Milton-L] Re: Fallen vs. Unfallen Sex
jamesrovira at gmail.com
Mon Jul 25 16:25:38 EDT 2011
What impresses me about this conversation is the level of complexity
that is always present in PL, even when Milton bends his narrative
toward the erotic. That is what sets it apart from what I normally
consider pornography, which tends to lack complexity and seldom even
strives for it. I don't see how PL and Debbie Does Dallas can be said
to be attempting to achieve the same effect. I don't see this claim
as supporting any kind of dogmatism, but rather trying to avoid
reductionism in literary treatments of the erotic.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Watt, James <jwatt at butler.edu> wrote:
> makes good sense. thanks, jim watt
> Does "the solace of their sin" echo the building of pandaemonium in Book 1, or even the fallen angels singing in Book 2:
> "Their song was partial; but the harmony
> (What could it less when spirits immortal sing?)
> Suspended hell"
> Milton allows the fallen angel some respite from their hell through building their palace, but also through creating beautiful harmonies that remind them and the reader that these beings were once glorious before they fell. That they sing, something the angels clearly still enjoy, adds a note of poignancy (excuse the pun).
More information about the Milton-L