[Milton-L] Nude or Naked?
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges at yahoo.com
Sun Jul 24 16:16:07 EDT 2011
Thanks for the response, which ought to generate more discussion . . .
By the way, I'm "Jeffery."
From: "Watt, James" <jwatt at butler.edu>
To: John Milton Discussion List <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Sent: Mon, July 25, 2011 4:57:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Milton-L] Nude or Naked?
nude means aesthetic, not erotic
naked means erotic, not aesthetic
just as making love means something coextensive
and fucking means something lonely, but intensive.
Even as most of this discussion of Milton's eroticism
has been about as pertinent as [Henry] Miller's aestheticism...
...but scholars are human, too and, like their great archetype, are always
and then fleeing, murmuring; and with them flee the shades of night. (4:1013ff)
wanted to add 'scattering footnotes,' but better sense prevailed.
From: milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu [milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu]
on behalf of Horace Jeffery Hodges [jefferyhodges at yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 3:37 PM
To: John Milton Discussion List
Subject: [Milton-L] Nude or Naked?
Given our discussion of late, I found this interesting:
"Lucian Freud, Figurative Painter Who Redefined Portraiture, Is Dead at 88"
William Grimes, New York Times (July 11, 2011)
This observation is particularly apt:
"His female subjects in particular seemed not just nude but obtrusively naked."
Is this a meaningless distinction? Should Grimes have written:
"His female subjects in particular seemed not just nude but obtrusively nude."
"His female subjects in particular seemed not just naked but obtrusively naked."
Or do we need a terminological distinction here to express more starkly what is
Milton-L mailing list
Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
Manage your list membership and access list archives at
Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Milton-L