[Milton-L] KJV in NYTimes

Mitchell M. Harris mitchell.harris at augie.edu
Tue Jan 11 11:15:06 EST 2011

Dear Jameela, Nancy, Hannibal, and others-

Perhaps I will show my own ignorance here, but I would love to know  
what editions (scholarly, facsimile, etc.) each of you trusts with  
early modern Bibles. For example, which Tyndale do you use, which  
Geneva, which King James, which Bishops, etc.?

I finally tired of walking over to the library every time I wanted to  
look at the Geneva edition and bought Lloyd Berry's facsimile edition  
of the 1560 Geneva Bible. I'm wondering, however, if there are better  
editions out there, and I'd certainly like to know more about Tyndale,  
King James, Bishops, and the like.

All the best,
	Mitch Harris

Mitchell M. Harris
Assistant Professor
Department of English
Augustana College
2001 S. Summit Ave.
Sioux Falls, SD 57197
(605) 274-5297
mitchell.harris at augie.edu

"To stand inquiring right, is not to stray;
To sleep, or run wrong, is."

				- John Donne

On Jan 10, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Jameela Lares wrote:

> Nancy,
> I am happy to see any discussion of the KJV in this its 400th year,  
> as I am starting a Ph.D. seminar next week on Milton, Bunyan, and  
> the King James Bible.
> In the past for such classes, I have used F. F. Bruce's History of  
> the Bible in English (Lutterworth, 2003), though this year I am  
> using a trade book written by a Miltonist, Gordon Campbell's  
> readable Bible: The Story of the King James Version, 1611-2011.  The  
> UK amazon site has an entertaining video of of the author: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bible-Story-James-Version-1611-2011/dp/0199557594/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1294699561&sr=1-1 
> .
> I'll be having the students each choose a book and an article to  
> report on.  I've already attached my selected bibliography to the  
> syllabus, but if anyone wants to list a favorite title, I'm all ears.
> Jameela Lares
> Professor of English
> The University of Southern Mississippi
> 118 College Drive, #5037
> Hattiesburg, MS  39406-0001
> 601 266-4319 ofc
> 601 266-5757 fax
> ________________________________________
> From: milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu [milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu 
> ] On Behalf Of Nancy Charlton [nbcharlton at comcast.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 4:36 PM
> To: John Milton Discussion List
> Subject: [Milton-L] KJV in NYTimes
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/opinion/09sun3.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha211
> This is the URL for a short and gracious appraisal of the place the  
> King James Bible holds in literature and culture. The author Verlyn  
> Klinkenborg, concludes:  "Its words are almost never Latinate, and  
> its rhythms are never hampered by the literalism that afflicts other  
> translations."
> I've started and erased half a dozen sentences commenting on this  
> and trying to bring it deliberately into the purview of Milton  
> studies, but the most original thing I can think of, and I don't  
> recall it ever being discussed here, is the question of verbal  
> antiquity and archaism in Milton's works.
> Many in our day are as ill-equipped as Tyndale's ploughboy to take  
> on, say, PL XI.385-422, but few would not be touched by "...took  
> their solitary way" or "Earth felt the wound." Milton was generally  
> aware of himself as the author or narrator or any piece, but he was  
> never preoccupied with his own responses. This he has in common with  
> the Bible narrations and even where the poet pours out his soul and  
> describes  physiological effects ("I wept") still focus on the  
> reason ("...when I remembered Zion.")
> Would this be worth a discussion, or a study?
> Nancy Charlton
> _______________________________________________
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
> Manage your list membership and access list archives at http://lists.richmond.edu/mailman/listinfo/milton-l
> Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/

More information about the Milton-L mailing list