[Milton-L] Re: orthodox doctrine in Milton vs "tasteless"
tlindall at gmail.com
Fri Dec 17 13:09:55 EST 2010
Carol: Just one more thing. I have a degree in Philosophy as well as
English Lit. so let me point out that your assertion that a plumber, actor,
or artist may not express opinions on Milton is an *ad hominem fallacy*, id
est, the argument against the man. I might assert that you are not qualified
to reason logically because you are not a philosopher. I do not maintain
that position, of course.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Carol Barton <cbartonphd1 at verizon.net>wrote:
> As will I, Jeffrey and Dennis. But thank you for (attempting) to change the
> subject to something less conspicuosly self-indulgent nonetheless. I doubt
> that any Miltonist would presume to lecture Mr. Sirrah on the relative
> merits of any particular school of acting, *so I am at something of a loss
> to understand what makes him think himself qualified to pontificate on
> Milton's shortcomings as a poet.
> Best to all,
> Carol Barton
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shoulson, Jeffrey" <
> jshoulson at mail.as.miami.edu>
> To: "John Milton Discussion List" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 12:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [Milton-L] Re: orthodox doctrine in Milton vs "tasteless"
> I'll join the chorus of bah-humbugs, Dennis.
>> On Dec 17, 2010, at 12:02 PM, Dennis Danielson wrote:
>> Am I merely Scrooge-like in my old age (I do know I'm getting
>>> repetitious), or do others too get the impression that discussions on
>>> this list occasionally bang on as if none of the Milton scholarship of
>>> the past thirty years ever saw the light of day?
>>> Or perhaps therein lies a chastening tale about the influence of
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
> Manage your list membership and access list archives at
> Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Milton-L