[Milton-L] Milton and Newton (Again?)
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 22 21:01:17 EDT 2009
Thanks, Todd. I'll be interested to see what papers come out of that.
--- On Tue, 9/22/09, Butler, Todd Wayne <butlert at wsu.edu> wrote:
From: Butler, Todd Wayne <butlert at wsu.edu>
Subject: RE: [Milton-L] Milton and Newton (Again?)
To: "John Milton Discussion List" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Date: Tuesday, September 22, 2009, 5:47 PM
There was a whole conference in Sussex this summer devoted to just this issue—I wasn’t there so I can’t say much about it (perhaps someone else on this list was?), but all of the information, including paper abstracts, can be found at
Associate Professor and Buchanan Scholar
Vice Chair, Department of English
Washington State University
Pullman, WA 99164-5020
From: milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu [mailto:milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu] On Behalf Of Horace Jeffery Hodges
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:33 PM
To: John Milton Discussion List
Subject: [Milton-L] Milton and Newton (Again?)
I've been listening lately to several lectures by one of my old history-of-science professors, John Heilbron, and I was struck by his response to a question that followed his lecture on "Physics and History: Fractured in Modernity," at about 54 minutes and 30 seconds into the video:
The question concerned Newton's 'obsessive' interest in 'nonscientific' things and was posed by a scientist puzzled about Newton's obsessions with scriptural interpretation.
Here's what I wrote to John after watching the video:
I was struck by your remark in response to a question from a scientist about Newton's 'other' interests. You stated that Newton considered himself a "prophet." What struck me was the fact that Milton thought the same of himself. I wonder if anyone has written a comparison of Milton and Newton, for the former not only seems to have considered himself a prophet but busied himself in all areas of knowledge. Something about the 17th century seems to have driven individuals -- or Milton and Newton, anyway -- to attempt a regrounding of all knowledge. I suppose that it's part of that great historical process set in motion by the collapse of the Medieval worldview.
John suggested that I add Galileo to the list, and I suspect that one might even add Descartes -- who needed God's 'revelation' to ensure the truth of his system.
Anyway, since Milton and Newton had such similar interests, have many comparative studies been done of the two?
This is the sort of thing that I ought to know about already (and I recall that we had some discussion of this recently), but I confess myself quite ignorant.
By the way, John's first lecture, "Physics and History: Forged in the Baroque," is also good:
It's also about an hour in length.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
Milton-L mailing list
Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
Manage your list membership and access list archives at http://lists.richmond.edu/mailman/listinfo/milton-l
Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Milton-L