[Milton-L] De Doctrina Christiana

FLANNAGAN, ROY ROY at uscb.edu
Fri Jan 2 12:53:24 EST 2009


 
The starting place, as ever, would be in Maurice Kelley's This Great Argument, which matches the epic against the treatise point by theological point.  Sometimes Kelley makes the treatise into a kind of Procrustean bed, but what he wrote still seems well-organized and concise.  That book made Kelley's academic reputation, and it might have assured him a home at Princeton.
 
Michael Bauman might speak best for the differences between epic and treatise, but I think comparing the two works with each other works better than contrasting them with each other.
 
Roy Flannagan 

________________________________

From: milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu on behalf of Michael Gillum
Sent: Fri 1/2/2009 11:41 AM
To: milton-l
Subject: Re: [Milton-L] De Doctrina Christiana


Extending Hannibal Hamlin's question, could I ask people to say what they think are  important differences between ideas stated in DDC and ideas stated or clearly implied in PL (as you interpret it)?

Michael




On 1/2/09 11:18 AM, "Hannibal Hamlin" <hamlin.hannibal at gmail.com> wrote:



	A further question that is more hermeneutic than bibliographic -- to what extent can Paradise Lost (say) be legitimately interpreted in light of De Doctrina?  This seems to have become common practice, for the obvious reason that the theological positions stated in De Doctrina are considerably easier to determine than those in PL.  But De Doctrina isn't really a handbook to the theology of PL, is it?  If the same man wrote both works, that's certainly interesting, but can we assume that both works express the same ideas, or that their author was of the same mind when he wrote both works?  We might even ask about the relationship about theological ideas to the (written) linguistic expression of them: i.e., is it possible that language can generate ideas as much as the reverse, and even that different kinds of writing (dramatic fictional English verse, say, as opposed to expository Latin prose) might tend to generate different ideas?
	 
	Hannibal
	
	 
	On 1/2/09, Thomas Corns <els009 at bangor.ac.uk> wrote: 
	

		
		May I suggest reading at least the last chapter of Gordon Campbell, Thomas
		N. Corns, John K. Hale, and Fiona Tweedie, JOHN MILTON AND THE MANUSCRIPT OF
		DE DOCTRINA CHRISTIANA (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)?
		
		If time is more pressing, then go with Michael Bauman: yes.
		
		DE DOCTRINA CHRISTIANA is being edited for the new Oxford Complete Works of
		John Milton; John Hale is the volume editor for that volume.
		
		Best
		Tom Corns
		
		
		
		
		--
		Gall y neges e-bost hon, ac unrhyw atodiadau a anfonwyd gyda hi,
		gynnwys deunydd cyfrinachol ac wedi eu bwriadu i'w defnyddio'n unig
		gan y sawl y cawsant eu cyfeirio ato (atynt). Os ydych wedi derbyn y
		neges e-bost hon trwy gamgymeriad, rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr ar
		unwaith a dilëwch y neges. Os na fwriadwyd anfon y neges atoch chi,
		rhaid i chi beidio â defnyddio, cadw neu ddatgelu unrhyw wybodaeth a
		gynhwysir ynddi. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwynt yn eiddo i'r sawl a'i
		hanfonodd yn unig  ac nid yw o anghenraid yn cynrychioli barn
		Prifysgol Bangor. Nid yw Prifysgol Bangor yn gwarantu
		bod y neges e-bost hon neu unrhyw atodiadau yn rhydd rhag firysau neu
		100% yn ddiogel. Oni bai fod hyn wedi ei ddatgan yn uniongyrchol yn
		nhestun yr e-bost, nid bwriad y neges e-bost hon yw ffurfio contract
		rhwymol - mae rhestr o lofnodwyr awdurdodedig ar gael o Swyddfa
		Cyllid Prifysgol Bangor.  www.bangor.ac.uk <http://www.bangor.ac.uk> <http://www.bangor.ac.uk/>  
		
		This email and any attachments may contain confidential material and
		is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).  If you have
		received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately
		and delete this email.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), you
		must not use, retain or disclose any information contained in this
		email.  Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender and do
		not necessarily represent those of the Bangor University.
		Bangor University does not guarantee that this email or
		any attachments are free from viruses or 100% secure.  Unless
		expressly stated in the body of the text of the email, this email is
		not intended to form a binding contract - a list of authorised
		signatories is available from the Bangor University Finance
		Office.  www.bangor.ac.uk <http://www.bangor.ac.uk> <http://www.bangor.ac.uk/>  
		
		_______________________________________________
		Milton-L mailing list
		Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
		Manage your list membership and access list archives at http://lists.richmond.edu/mailman/listinfo/milton-l
		
		Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/
		

	
	
	



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 7202 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.richmond.edu/pipermail/milton-l/attachments/20090102/8cc7b3a1/attachment.bin


More information about the Milton-L mailing list