[Milton-L] Fetishizing Greatness, was Re: Is Paradise Lost
Horace Jeffery Hodges
jefferyhodges at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 24 16:41:25 EDT 2009
Jim, what I find interesting in the example below (as well as those from the Tractatus) is that you have taken prose and changed it into poetry by imposing a recognizably poetic form onto it. We are forced to read it as poetry -- perhaps bad poetry, but poetry nonetheless.
This doesn't quite disprove your point, since the form is a distinction between prose and poetry, but it does put offer a different perspective on things.
--- On Fri, 4/24/09, James Rovira <jamesrovira at gmail.com> wrote:
From: James Rovira <jamesrovira at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Milton-L] Fetishizing Greatness, was Re: Is Paradise Lost
To: "John Milton Discussion List" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2009, 1:53 PM
Yes. The fact that a philosopher can talk about poetry intelligently
(or say intelligent things that we can apply to the study of poetry)
does not mean he is writing poetry when doing so.
Forgive me, let me correct myself:
The fact that
a philosopher can
talk about poetry
intelligent things that
we can apply
to the study of
he is writing
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Dr. Larry Gorman <larry at eastwest.edu> wrote:
> But aren't the concepts "poetry" and "prose" very much like the concept
> of "game" as discussed in Philosophical Investigations?
Milton-L mailing list
Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
Manage your list membership and access list archives at http://lists.richmond.edu/mailman/listinfo/milton-l
Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Milton-L