jherz at alcor.concordia.ca
Tue Jun 24 16:03:47 EDT 2008
Eve, then Adam, as each begins the process of talking themselves into
falling, hence the fractured self. One can certainly claim, as I am in the
process of doing in a related argument, that fracture is the name (or, at
least, one of the names) of the PL game.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gillum" <mgillum at unca.edu>
To: "milton-l" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [Milton-L] Abdiel
> Incidentally, I thought Coiro's review was well done except that I was
> puzzled by this section. I wonder if there are other interior monologues
> unfallen characters in the poem besides Abdiel's at 6.114.
> About Abdiel following Satan initially: Satan instructed Beelzebub to
> them that by command I am to haste. . . homeward. . . there to prepare fit
> entertainment. . ." (5.685-90). So Satan's followers thought they were
> following God's orders. It's true that Beelzebub cast "ambiguous words and
> jealousies" (5.703) among his orders to the sub-commanders, but no telling
> whether these reached Abdiel.
> On 6/24/08 2:12 PM, "Watt, James" <jwatt at butler.edu> wrote:
>> Thanks Michael:
>> I am always amused by Miltonists who are determined to out angel his
>> Here I am especially pleased to learn that Ms. Coiro believes that
>> subjectivity is a mark of the Fall (especially interesting in light of
>> high degree of subjective and interior reflection manifested by the
>> I wonder if gender is another mark of fallen subjectivity? Or hell, what
>> about simple sex?
>> Jim Watt
>> From: milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu
>> [milton-l-bounces at lists.richmond.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Gillum
>> [mgillum at unca.edu]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:31 AM
>> To: milton-l
>> Subject: [Milton-L] Abdiel
>> Not much discussion of Milton¹s poetry here lately. What are people¹s
>> reactions to these points?
>> ³Abdiel is a decidedly mixed character >> capable of an interior
>> monologue, a mark of fallen subjectivity; and he is
>> more zealous than brilliant in his argument with his fallen general. If
>> is Miltonic representation here it is fractured and self-critical.²
>> --Ann Baynes Coiro, review of Stephen Fallon¹s new book in latest MQ.
>> Milton-L mailing list
>> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
>> Manage your list membership and access list archives at
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
> Manage your list membership and access list archives at
More information about the Milton-L