[Milton-L] Abdiel (thought-sins)
jherz at alcor.concordia.ca
Sun Jul 6 18:31:19 EDT 2008
But.... Eve never says that she ate. It is an action without agency.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gillum" <mgillum at unca.edu>
To: "milton-l" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Milton-L] Abdiel (thought-sins)
> On 7/6/08 4:44 PM, "Harold Skulsky" <hskulsky at email.smith.edu> wrote:
> [snip]> As will be clear in a few short paragraphs, I have reason to doubt
>> that I ever identified Dream Eve with Eve.
>> Call the series of dreamed events S. For Eve to dream that S is
>> happening to her is
>> (a) for Eve to be asleep,
>> (b) for Eve to be encountering S-APPEARANCES but no
>> (c) for Eve to mistake the S-APPEARANCES for S-REALITIES
>> (d) for Eve (as a result of (c)) to respond to the
>> S-APPEARANCES as if they were S-REALITIES.
>> Given (a-d), it is Eve (and not a Dream Eve) who is doing the dreaming,
>> i.e., who is taken in by empty S-appearances she encounters, and who
>> responds to the S-appearances in various ways < for example, by "damp
>> horror" and by irresistibly desiring apples she SEEMS to be seeing,
>> smelling, etc.
>> In short, there is no conceptual work here for a Dream Eve to do <
> Sorry to have misrepresented your position.
> A question: why does Eve in the dream feel an irresistible compulsion to
> eat? ("I, me thought, / Could not but taste.") Is that a normal response
> Eve, the person, or of any normal person, to the S-appearances of the
> To me it suggests some difference between the dream-self and the proper
> self. If we suppose that some of her responses are being manipulated, then
> she is not quite herself.
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
> Manage your list membership and access list archives at
More information about the Milton-L