[Milton-L] RE: Samson's prayer for revengr

James Rovira jamesrovira at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 19:05:26 EST 2008

Don't we need to make a distinction between Satan's deliberate verbal
ambiguity in PL and Milton's deliberate narrative ambiguity in SA?  In
the former case it's clear that Satan clearly does not want to
disclose himself -- the point is deception.  In the latter case, isn't
it possible that Milton himself didn't know if -his- Samson was really

Jim R

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 6:56 PM,  <jfleming at sfu.ca> wrote:
> But the point, for Puttenham and for Milton's Christ, is that ambiguity is a
>  bad thing (rather than being a valuable aesthetic arrangement, as it is for
>  Empson, Brooks et al). It indicates that there is no point attending to the
>  utterance, or part of an utterance, where it appears. Transferred to _SA_,
>  the inference would seem to be, not that ambiguity is not present, but that
>  there is no point inquiring much into it. Ambiguity says "I'm here; look
>  elsewhere." JD Fleming

More information about the Milton-L mailing list