[Milton-L] soliciting of reviews & etc.

Hannibal Hamlin hamlin.hannibal at gmail.com
Wed Dec 17 16:22:45 EST 2008


Thanks for the useful summary, Scott.  I've enjoyed this discussion.  Could
you please remind us when the APPOSITIONS conference is near?  I agree that
reviewing is terribly under-discussed amoung scholars and teachers.

Best,

Hannibal


On 12/17/08, Scott Howard <showard at du.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to the lively and interesting recent
> discussion about book reviews: administrative and editorial considerations;
> readerly and writerly concerns; professional development matters; and
> scholarly best practices.
>
> I think that, at the very least, the conversation highlights a few current
> needs in the field:
>
> * for the subject to be openly explored and discussed among established and
> emerging professionals;
>
> * and for that conversation to include editors from a variety of journals
> in the same field and also from other related fields; and
>
> * for the matter of book reviewing to be taught in targeted graduate-level
> courses;
>
> * and for new statements to be drafted about editorial best practices that
> address the various ways in which different kinds of journals build
> different sorts of relationships with different communities.
>
> The range and number (more than 40, including direct replies to my address)
> of recent postings to this list also demonstrates, I believe, that
> administrative and editorial practices vary quite a bit from journal to
> journal when it comes to how book reviews are managed from inquiry to
> process to production.  Some journals (including RES) send their book
> reviews out for peer-review; others (such as RQ) commission reviews; while
> other journals (like RELARTS) openly invite proposals for books to be
> reviewed.
>
> I invite you to continue the discussion.  APPOSITIONS will host a special
> feature/event, during our February e-conference, for further conversation
> about the practice/politics/pedagogy of book reviewing.
>
> Happy holidays.
>
> Best wishes,
> Scott
>
> p.s. . . . and, given the number of inquiries I've received, there's a good
> chance that our journal--following due process, of course--may be
> publishing, in May, a review of the book that was recently mentioned in my
> first message to the list on 12/11.
>
> ///
>
> W. Scott Howard
> Associate Professor
> Director of Graduate Studies
> Department of English
> University of Denver
> http://mysite.du.edu/~showard/
>
> Editor,
> APPOSITIONS:
> Studies in Renaissance / Early Modern Literature & Culture,
> http://appositions.blogspot.com/
>
> ///
> _______________________________________________
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
> Manage your list membership and access list archives at
> http://lists.richmond.edu/mailman/listinfo/milton-l
>
> Milton-L web site: http://johnmilton.org/
>



-- 
Hannibal Hamlin
Associate Professor of English
The Ohio State University
Burkhardt Fellow,
The Folger Shakespeare Library
201 East Capitol Street SE
Washington, DC 20003
hamlin.22 at osu.edu/
hamlin.hannibal at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.richmond.edu/pipermail/milton-l/attachments/20081217/263086fb/attachment.html


More information about the Milton-L mailing list