[Milton-L] 'Myth' of "Unfallen" language

James Rovira jamesrovira at gmail.com
Sun Sep 30 20:43:39 EDT 2007

Sorry, but I meant "human language is not similarly divisible from the
human mind" in the sentence below.

Jim R

> My initial point was that the premise is false: human language is not
> similarly indivisible from the human mind.  If the human mind is
> fallen, then the human language proceeding from it is necessarily
> fallen.

More information about the Milton-L mailing list