[Milton-L] milton's all
Gregory.Machacek at marist.edu
Thu Sep 20 11:55:31 EDT 2007
Harold Skulsky says: "Teskey's interpretation of PL 7.168-173 won't work,
at least as paraphrased by Machacek."
I hope everyone interested in these matters will do Teskey the justice of
reading his interesting argument *not* as paraphrased by Machacek, but as
actually conducted by him in Delirious Milton. I cited the Norton gloss
only because it conveys some of the flavor of Teskey's argument, and seemed
more appropriately sized for e-mail communication.
Associate Professor of English
More information about the Milton-L