[Milton-L]: "that sure was worse"

Carol Barton cbartonphd at earthlink.net
Sat May 20 15:59:46 EDT 2006


Apologies if any of you receive this twice: it has not shown up in my "in"
box, so I am assuming that it was lost in cyberspace, and sending again . .
.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carol Barton" <cbartonphd at earthlink.net>
To: "John Milton Discussion List" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Milton-L]: "that sure was worse"


> Jeffrey, I think you (and your daughter) are reading the line with the
wrong
> (modern) usage and emphasis, and no, I don't think Milton intended any
kind
> of humor whatsoever here.
>
> The "sure" doesn't mean what it does in the modern context of "I sure I am
> hungry" (difficult to translate, but something like "I'm REALLY hungry").
It
> means "of a certainty": Belial is arguing that they have already
experienced
> what it means to suffer worse, BUT HE'S WRONG (except in human terms,
where
> bodily suffering--physical torture--is the worst thing we can imagine). In
> _Dr. Faustus_, the title character is surprised that Mephistopheles has
> "escaped" from hell because he doesn't show any of the physical (Dantean)
> signs of damnation that Faustus expects to see: but the demon responds
"Why,
> this is hell, nor am I out of it." Eternal separation from God is the
worst
> any created being can suffer, as Satan himself will tell you in his
> invocation to the Sun [Son] in Book IV, he suffers supremely, perhaps
> because he alone understands fully and completely what he has lost: God's
> "eternal wrath" translates to his own "eternal despair" of grace, his
> eternal rejection from the heavenly Paradise, his eternal separation from
> all that is good and right and happy. Indeed, there is "Hell within him,
for
> with him Hell /
> He brings, and round about him, nor from Hell / One step no more than from
> himself can fly / By change of place" (4.20-23). Think of Claudius, with
his
> crown and his queen in _Hamlet_--he has everything he ever wanted, and
those
> things he wanted enough to commit not only murder, but fratricide to
obtain
> them . . . yet he cannot be happy, because in his heart, he understands
the
> price he has paid, is paying, and will pay forevermore.
>
> Belial and Mammon have not yet learned to feel the torment that Satan does
.
> . . or to understand the futility of their machinations . . . though
Moloch
> unwittingly comes close: "what can be worse/
> Then to dwell here, driv'n out from bliss, condemn'd/
> In this abhorred deep to utter woe" is to "dwell here, driv'n out from
> bliss" *understanding* the immutability of that woe--of that
separation--of
> that excommunicaton.
>
> As for the question regarding the "eternall anarchie" of Chaos--I think
that
> should be read as "from its inception without end," rather than as deeply
as
> you and Salwa are trying--in good faith--to interpret it. Stanley Fish has
> likened Chaos to God's Home Depot--which sounds irreverent until you think
> about it. It's the place where God (being a prudent manufacturer) stores
his
> raw materials, elements he hasn't assembled into anything meaningful. It
is
> and ever shall be a place of "nothingness" in the sense of meaningful
> substance, though it is more than "nothing." I don't think there's any
> implication intended as to its being co-original with God. It is "eternal"
> in the sense of waiting eternally in the expectation that Mr. or Ms. Right
> (or Godot?) is going to come . . . not "eternal" in the sense that God is.
>
> That's my two cents on the subject(s), anyway.
>
> Best to all,
>
> Carol Barton
>



More information about the Milton-L mailing list