[Milton-L] Strier, the Son's role and necessity-- last try

James Rovira jamesrovira at gmail.com
Wed Aug 9 21:26:10 EDT 2006

In our own experience, moral reasoning is something we are taught, not
something we innately have.  As a result moral reasoning appears to be
extraneous to our natures.  In the nature of God, morality and God's
nature are equivalent.  No one taught God what is right as we were
taught.  Therefore the rigid necessity is nothing but God's fidelity
to his own nature which, since God is also the creator of the
universe, is also inherent in the structure of existence.

Jim R

On 8/9/06, Carrol Cox <cbcox at ilstu.edu> wrote:

> That "rigid satisfaction" (and all the immense theological apparatus
> surrounding it, qualifying it, emphasizing it, ete etc) is the sticking
> point. And of course in the plot of the epic it is the shoehorn by means
> of which The Son is given a role to play, a role wholly grounded in this
> absurdity of the need for "rigid satisfaction." And if The Father is not
> bound by necessity, then why is he bound by the Necessity of demanding
> rigid satisfaction?
> Carrol

More information about the Milton-L mailing list