[Milton-L] Re: porno vs. art?

James Rovira jrovira at drew.edu
Tue Nov 29 10:27:14 EST 2005


Just a small note: Carrol's email was intercepted by my spam blocker and 
quarantined.

Guess it fit someone's definition...

Jim R.

Carrol Cox wrote:

> Certainly some (self-labelled) pornography is carefully crafted, which
> is the core sense of art I believe. One could, then, speak of the "Art
> of Pornography." But in any case, pornography as such (assuming for the
> sake of argument that it is definable) ought still be protected speech.
> And secondly, its legitimacvy being granted, it is neither more nor less
> difficult to define than any other literary genre. 



More information about the Milton-L mailing list