rumrich at mail.utexas.edu
Fri Jul 8 12:04:01 EDT 2005
I'm not sure that's such a bad thing--that we'll never feel safe.
Security is mortals' chiefest enemy, or something like that, as a weird
woman is supposed to have said. And the last line of Flannery
O'Conner's "A Good Man is Hard to Find" has stayed with me, and seemed
pertinent with extraordinary frequency, over the decades since I last
read the story: "She was a good old woman as long it was someone
holding a gun to her head." That's probably an inaccurate quotation,
but you get the point, I'm sure. I'd prefer not to have a gun to my
head, obviously. Yet we're all going to die; it's just a question of
when the gun goes off, and it's best that we keep aware of that
condition so that we can be good old women or men. The point is how
well we live while we have the chance.
I very much apologize if this seems homiletic or somehow dismissive
(for me, personally, it serves as hard earned wisdom--which may just
show how impoverished I am in that regard). Anyway, it's an honest
contribution and I don't have an ironic shield for it, so please put a
charitable construction on what I've said.
On Jul 7, 2005, at 9:50 PM, James Rovira wrote:
> There's an element of irony in this, though, no? Because they did hit
> again. That means, I think, we're going to have to live with violence
> eventually. There will be another successful attack in the US. There
> will probably be successful attacks, eventually, in France too, and in
> other industrialized nations: probably in every G8 nation. I don't
> think there are or ever will be any concessions we can make to get
> them to stop attacking, and we'll never be able to stop them all, so
> violence is inevitable. And even if the current group of attackers
> went away, we will still have people like the Oklahoma City bomber
> acting independently. This is the product of a ubiquitous system that
> provides structure, safety, and a living that is also necessarily
> oppressive. All that can be done is restraint and minimizing the
> damage. If we stop nine out of ten attacks, or 99 out of 100, or 999
> out of 1000, there's still that one attack. We will never feel safe
> again, not in our lifetimes.
> Jim Rovira
> Rose Williams wrote:
>> Amen. The authorities in Madrid did a good job of this, running the
>> train bombers down. May London
>> do the same.
>> Rose Williams
>>> There is nothing we can do in response to terrorism to stop the next
>>> attack other than catching terrorists before they attack again.
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
> Manage your list membership and access list archives at
More information about the Milton-L