mcdermot at clunet.edu
Wed Feb 16 16:29:11 EST 2005
I wonder if that shouldn't be the 1560 Geneva Bible.
Peter L. McDermott, M.d., Ph.D.
is cunning sometimes quantitative?
>From: Matthew Stallard [mailto:ms493101 at ohio.edu]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 03:57 PM
>To: 'John Milton Discussion List'
>Subject: Re: [Milton-L] Satan
> I tend to read the generous development of Satan's character taking place
>early in the epic diegesis as a means for Milton to mitigate the
>sinful/"missing the mark" actions of Adam and Eve. The Hebrew text of the
>Genesis narrative by contrast, aside from Satan's brief but dense
>rhetorical flourish in Genesis chapter three, does nothing to suggest the
>appearance of nobility (faux or vrai) in the serpent. I suppose one could
>make a case that the serpent's designation "more subtil than anie beast of
>the field" suggests a cautious and perhaps disingenuous spirit. "Subtil" is
>a rendering of ARUWM which suggests a qualitative cunning, craftiness, or
> More likely, though, the glosses of the 1530 Geneva Bible do more to
>condition the response of the Calvinist reader. On verses 1-5: "As Satan
>can change himselfe into an Angel of light, so did he abuse the wisdome of
>the serpent to deceaue man. God suffered Satan to make the serpent his
>instrument and to speake in him. In douting of Gods threatning, she yelded
>to Satan. This is Satans chiefest subtiltie, to cause vs not to feare Gods
>threatenings. As thogh he shulde say, God doeth not forbid you to eat of
>the frute, saue that he knoweth that if you shulde eat thereof, you shulde
>be like to him."
>Department of English
>347 Ellis Hall
>Athens, OH 45701
>matthew.s.stallard.1 at ohio.edu
>--On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 4:27 PM -0500 James Rovira
><jrovira at drew.edu> wrote:
>> I suspect that just as Milton could assume the majority of his audience
>> would be repulsed by Satan from the start, so can Ms. Ostriker assume
>> that her audience will at least understand attaction to Satan from the
>> start. We do spend a great deal of time with Satan at the beginning of
>> Paradise Lost before meeting any other characters -- without a prior
>> commitment to rejecting the Satanic as evil this, by itself, could be
>> enough. But I think the distinction between assumption and demonstration
>> is a good one.
>> Jim Rovira
>> Angelica Duran wrote:
>>> Dear scholars,
>>> Someone on this list recommended Alicia Ostriker's _Dancing at the
>>> Devil's Party: Essays on Poetry, Politics, and the Erotic_. Thank you
>>> for the reference: there are so many important books to read, and we
>>> can't be aware of all of them. I would recommend the slim book: very
>>> interesting. The book, however, left me still wanting an account of the
>>> attraction to Satan in _Paradise Lost_.
>>> Angelica Duran
>> Milton-L mailing list
>> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
>Milton-L mailing list
>Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
More information about the Milton-L