digitalplacebo at shaw.ca
Tue Feb 15 12:40:06 EST 2005
I much agree. I haven't read many pieces of literature in which I didn't
at least one of the characters unattractive. In Dickens for example, Uriah
repulsed me in many ways, though I never found my liking/disliking of his
character to detract from my overall appreciation of the work. Milton, I
makes it easy for his readers to push and pull with his characters; but
that is much of the beauty of PL. I also find your appeal to the
of opposites in Milton's God and Satan to be a great way to view the dymanic
between characters and perhaps also, an excellent commentary on the
motto: "as above, so below."
"Sum Ergo Cogito."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carrol Cox" <cbcox at ilstu.edu>
To: "John Milton Discussion List" <milton-l at lists.richmond.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Milton-L] Satan
> Angelica Duran wrote:
>> Dear scholars,
>> As with many works, Ostriker maintains, rather than describes or accounts
>> for, the assumption that all readers like Milton's Satan, or like him
>> than Milton's God, Milton's Adam, etc. We have records of many early
>> who did not find Satan attractive.
> Liking or disliking literary characters is not, it seems to me, a
> necessary accompaniment for admiring and responding to the work in which
> they occur. I don't have that sort of response to _any_ of the
> characters in either PL or PR, except, perhaps, to the narrator, and I
> have never felt that to be any barrier to my delight in the poems.
> Milton's Satan and his God seem rather inseparable: the one implies the
> other, and both (taken outside the poem) imply a trivializing of human
> life through the offensive doctrine of immortality. But that hardly (for
> me) interferes with the poem's power, any more than Pound's repellant
> politics interfere with that poem's power.
> Milton-L mailing list
> Milton-L at lists.richmond.edu
More information about the Milton-L