[Milton-L] historicism, formalism, etc. (Skulsky)

[alan horn]

My position is that the idea of method -- objective, or
> non-interpretative, adequation of the understanding -- can never give a
> satisfactory account of understanding (basically because it begs the
> question)

Are there really any difficulties with this "adequation" beyond the
standard skeptical how-can-we-really-know-anything trope?

Alan H.