[Milton-L] Renaissance course tips
Carol Barton
cbartonphd1 at verizon.net
Tue Mar 4 12:46:18 EST 2008
I think you misunderstood my point, Hannibal:
(1) There is no way you can cover sufficient background, acclimate students
to Miltonic blank verse, or even give the most cursory reading of _Paradise
Lost_ in full in a survey course that will lead to anything like a full
appreciation of the poet and the poem.
(2) Even the two books I suggested require a good deal of preparation of the
kind identified above.
(3) It might be better, in a sophomore survey, to give students a broad
sample of Miltonic writing and thought by excerpt (organised thematically)
in a form and format in which they can fully assimilate it, and thus to whet
their appetites for more, than to try to cram as much PL into their reading
list as possible, and succeed only in reinforcing what seems to be the
non-specialist impression of him.
In no way--ever--would I advocate an impression of Milton as (1) a
Puritan--especially but not only when the term is used pejoratively; as (2)
an old white guy--whose work is irrelevant to the modern world; as (3) the
author of a long boring poem--ANY long boring poetry. I certainly haven't
cultivated that negative imagery at any time in my life--but I have often
been told by others (when they learn what my research interests are) how
much they "hated" Milton, and how surprising it is for them to hear from me
that studying his work could be a lifelong passion. Some have even been
inspired to go back and give him a second (fairer) chance.
All I'm suggesting is that, if we have to parcel Milton out piecemeal, we do
it in such a way that we spark an interest, rather than confirm (bad)
popular mythology.
Best to all,
Carol Barton
More information about the Milton-L
mailing list